2. Taylor francis : over 2500+ questions licenced from 18 text-books worth Β£191
3. Past examiners : Questions written by previous Medical School examiners
4. Track your performance : QBank uses intelegent software to keep you on track
The reviews are in
β β β β β
6,893 users
Don't take our word for it
"The stations you provide are strikingly similar to those I came across during my medical school finals (some even verbatim!), and I have tried many other exam platforms. I'm truly grateful for your priceless support throughout my final couple of years at medical school!"
Raza Q
"It has absolutely everything for medical school, so many histories with detailed differential diagnoses, how to approach emergencies, commonly prescribed drugs..every kind go examination youβll ever need in osces"
John R
"Thank you SO MUCH for the amazing educational resource. Iβve tried lots of platforms and books with mock OSCE stations and yours is by far and away the best Iβve tried"
Ed M
"Get this right away. So helpful for OSCEs but also general clinical learning and understanding. Wish I had brought it sooner"
Emma W
"Without a doubt, your platform outshines all other OSCE resources currently available. In all honesty, I can confidently attribute my success in securing a distinction in my finals to OSCEstop."
Harish K
"OSCEstop distinguishes itself from many other platform banks by offering a wealth of questions that mimic the demanding and complex aspects of our finals. This platform played a crucial role in ensuring I was ready for the level of difficulty that awaited me in my final exams."
Membership includes access to all 4 parts of the site:
1. Learning : All notes, viva questions, track progress
2. Stations : 10 years of past medical school stations. Includes: heart murmurs, ECGs, ABGs, CXR
3. Qbank : 2500+ questions from Taylor Francis books, complete MLA coverage
4. Conditions : all conditions mapped to MLA, progress tracking
The reviews are in
β β β β β
6,893 users
Don't take our word for it
"The stations you provide are strikingly similar to those I came across during my medical school finals (some even verbatim!), and I have tried many other exam platforms. I'm truly grateful for your priceless support throughout my final couple of years at medical school!"
Raza Q
"It has absolutely everything for medical school, so many histories with detailed differential diagnoses, how to approach emergencies, commonly prescribed drugs..every kind go examination youβll ever need in osces"
John R
"Thank you SO MUCH for the amazing educational resource. Iβve tried lots of platforms and books with mock OSCE stations and yours is by far and away the best Iβve tried"
Ed M
"Get this right away. So helpful for OSCEs but also general clinical learning and understanding. Wish I had brought it sooner"
Emma W
"Without a doubt, your platform outshines all other OSCE resources currently available. In all honesty, I can confidently attribute my success in securing a distinction in my finals to OSCEstop."
Harish K
"OSCEstop distinguishes itself from many other platform banks by offering a wealth of questions that mimic the demanding and complex aspects of our finals. This platform played a crucial role in ensuring I was ready for the level of difficulty that awaited me in my final exams."
FEV1/FVC ratio = Best FEV1 reading / Best FVC reading
Thank the patient and document results
Background physiology
Spirometry graph measurements
Obstructive vs. Restrictive disorders
Obstructive diseases such as asthma and COPD result in obstructed airways. This creates airway resistance to expiratory flow, so the patient struggles to get air out quickly and has a decreased FEV1. A smaller FEV1 also results in a smaller FEV1/FVC ratio.
NB: an obstructive pattern due to asthma will show reversibility following administration of a bronchodilator such as salbutamol.
Restrictive diseases such as pulmonary fibrosis/interstitial lung disease, obesity, neuromuscular and chest/spine deformitiesrestrict lung expansion, reducing the amount of air the lungs can hold (the vital capacity). This means the patient has a lower FVC. As there is decreased compliance and elasticity, it is also harder for the lungs to force air out quickly, resulting in a decreased FEV1. As both the FEV1 and the FVC have decreased, the FEV1/FVC ratio remains near normal.
Basic value interpretation
Obstructive
Restrictive
FEV1
β(<80%)
β(<80%)
FVC
N(>80%)
β(<80%)
FEV1/FVC ratio
β(<0.7)
N or β(0.7-0.8) (>0.8)
1. What is the FEV1? (<80% predicted = lung disease)
FEV1= volume expelled in the first second of forced expiration (calculated as % of predicted value)
Physiology: FEV1 is reduced in obstructive disorders because there is airway resistance to expiratory flow. It is also reduced in restrictive disorders because there is decreased compliance and elasticity, so the lungs cannot force air out quickly.
Results
FEV1 <80% predicted = lung disease
FEV1 >80% predicted = normal = no lung disease (breathlessness due to another cause, e.g. PE, vasculitis)
Other points: FEV1 is also used to grade severity of COPD into mild (β₯80%), moderate (50-80%), severe (30-50%), or very severe (<30%). Asthma is not usually diagnosed with spirometry (as tests are often normal when the patient is asymptomatic). However, reversibility of >12% of FEV1 with a bronchodilator may suggest the diagnosis. Asthma is usually diagnosed clinically or with serial peak flow demonstrating >20% diurnal variation.
2. What is the FVC? (<80% predicted = restrictive lung disease)
FVC = total volume expelled without time limit from maximal inspiration to forced maximal expiration (calculated as % of predicted value)
Physiology: FVC is reduced in restrictive disorders because there is reduced lung expansion, so the volume the lungs can hold is smaller. In obstructive disorders, there is airway resistance to expiratory flow, but a normal volume of air in the lungs, so the FVC is normal.
Results: FVC <80% predicted = restrictive disorder (FVC is normal in obstructive disorders)
Other points: VC = non-forced total volume expelled without time limit from maximal inspiration to maximal expiration (calculated as % of predicted value). The value will be similar to the FVC, which is more commonly used.
3. What is the FEV1/FVC ratio?
FEV1/FVC ratio = proportional volume breathed out in first second compared to the whole breath (normally 0.7-0.8)
Physiology: This is calculated by dividing the FEV1 value by the FVC value. It is low in obstructive disorders because the FEV1 is low and the FVC is normal (as above). It is normal or high in restrictive disorders because the FEV1 is low and the FVC is proportionally as low or lower.
Results
FEV1/FVC ratio <0.7 = obstructive
FEV1/FVC ratio 0.7-0.8 = normal or restrictive
FEV1/FVC ratio >0.8 = restrictive (if FVC more affected than FEV1)
TLC = total volume of air inside the lungs, including the VC (maximal volume that can be breathed in and out) and the residual volume (the volume left inside the airways after maximal expiration)
Results
TLC is low in restrictive disorders (as described above)
TLC may be high in emphysema because reduced elasticity causes hyperinflation and so results in a high RV. In this situation, the proportion of TLC comprised by the residual volume (the βRV%TLCβ) will also increase.
Diffusion (TLCO and KCO)
TLCO = total diffusing capacity of lung. To measure the TLCO, the patient inspires a fixed amount of carbon monoxide in a single breath. The quantity expired again is then calculated to determine how much has diffused into the blood.
KCO = TLCO/alveolar volume = diffusing capacity of lung per unit volume (i.e. as above but corrected for lung volume)
Results: a low TLCO may be due to:
Pulmonary vascular bed abnormalities (e.g. pulmonary embolism, pulmonary hypertension)
KCO is also low (because diffusion per unit alveolar volume is also affected)
KCO is normal (because KCO corrects for alveolar volume)
Other points: in the rare circumstance that both are raised, this suggests intra-alveolar haemorrhage (e.g. Granulomatosis with polyangiitis or Goodpasture syndrome)
Graph interpretation
Volume-time graph
The graph plots the total volume of air expired by time, from full inspiration until full expiration.
Normal β rapid increase in volume of air expired initially, then curve forms a plateau
Obstructive β prolonged increase (because air cannot be expired as quickly due to airway resistance) but ends at the same point because the FVC is normal
Restrictive β rapid increase as normal, but curve forms a plateau much sooner (because total air volume in lungs is smaller)
Flow-volume curve
The graph plots the expiratory flow rate (in litres per second) versus the volume expired (in litres), from full inspiration until full expiration, when air flow stops.
Normal: rapid increase in flow rate, then gradual decrease until the end of expiration
Obstructive: decreased peak expiratory flow rate with steeper reduction in flow rate after it peaks creating a characteristic dip in the curve (worst in emphysema, due to small airway collapse)
Restrictive: curve is normal in shape but smaller due to proportionally reduced flow rates (total volume of lungs is restricted)
We appreciate your trust and want to keep you informed about how we use your data and the terms of service. By agreeing to our terms and conditions, you'll help us provide you with the best possible experience.
Cookies
We use cookies to personalise content and ads, to provide social media features and to analyse our traffic. We also share information about your use of our site with our social media, advertising and analytics partners who may combine it with other information that youβve provided to them or that theyβve collected from your use of their services.
Examination Revision Purposes Only: The content provided on this website is intended solely for studentsβ examination revision purposes. It must not be used to inform clinical practice or to make any medical decisions. The publishers and authors accept no liability for the use of any information on the website.
Not a Substitute for Professional Medical Advice: This website should not be utilised by patients or as a replacement for professional medical advice, diagnosis, or treatment. Always seek the advice of a qualified healthcare provider with any questions you may have regarding a medical condition.
Accuracy and Currency of Content: The information on this website may not always be accurate, complete, or up to date. We make no representations or warranties of any kind regarding the accuracy, reliability, or completeness of any content.
UK-Based Practice: The medical content on this website is based on practices and guidelines applicable in the United Kingdom. Medical practices and regulations may vary significantly in other countries, and the information provided may not be appropriate or applicable outside the UK.
Drug Information and Dosages: Any drug information and dosages provided are intended for non-pregnant adults who are not breastfeeding and have normal renal and hepatic function. There is no guarantee that the drugs or dosages mentioned are correct, up to date, or licenced for the stated indications. Users should verify this information independently.
Local, National, and International Guidelines: This educational resource does not replace local, national, or international guidelines. Users are advised to consult and adhere to these guidelines in their practice.
Supervision and Indemnity: We advocate for users to be supervised by a licensed individual and to have appropriate medical indemnity. The websiteβs content should not be used in any practical setting.
Liability Limitation: The website, its publishers, authors, and reviewers disclaim all responsibility and legal liability for any use or misuse of the information provided. Users assume full responsibility for how they choose to use the content. This disclaimer applies to all damages, whether direct, indirect, consequential, or otherwise, that may arise from the use of the website.
No Doctor-Patient Relationship: Use of this website does not establish a doctor-patient relationship. If you are a healthcare provider, consult other professional sources and rely on your own professional judgement when making clinical decisions.